Blog 10

For my interview, I initially had trouble selecting and finding a participant to speak with. I was able to find several resources related to various stakeholder perspectives from congressional hearings. These perspectives included the airlines, the FAA, and representatives associated with airline unions. The documents helped provide additional context to the case and provided background knowledge on the case. Through a connection, I was able to identify an individual who works at Boeing and agreed to speak with me about their perspective on the case.

The individual I interviewed did not wish to be named or recorded but I was able to meet with them over Zoom for an hour-long interview. I was able to download the “Live Transcript” and take notes during the interview. They currently work for Boeing in an Information Technology centered role. Their perspective as a current employee is useful in considering the impact of the 737 Max controversy and how it has impacted the company over the past three years. While this employee was not directly involved or working on a project related to the 737 Max they have a useful view of the company’s culture shifts since the controversy.

Comments

  1. rf2021December 1, 2021 at 6:39 AM

    That must have been stressful! I was lucky, the first person I emailed and asked to interview responded fairly quickly, although then it took a while to find a time for the interview. She was fine with being recorded, named, and included in my video. It’s interesting how different the interview experience is, depending on the case, the person, how they are involved, etc. I’m surprised anyone would want to be interviewed for a grad school project though-- I think it benefits us more than it benefits them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post #2: The Botanist Who Defied Stalin

Whilst reading this article that discussed the life and contributions of botanist Nikolai Vavilov, I had several reactions. Vavilov and his team prioritized science at a time in their country where science merged with politics. Their views of science and botany were not in alignment with the politics taking over their country which lead to Vavilov himself being jailed. Furthermore, his team was left to protect the scientific contributions and seed repository. The repository was under attack from opposing political figures and starving citizens.  This article really challenged some of my views of scientific ethics. Vavilov and his team pledged their commitment to science over politics. This is similar to the challenges that scientists faced in other totalitarian regimes at the time. However, I find challenging that in a country where millions were starving, even several of the members themselves, they placed the upkeep seed repository above the well-being of the public. While ...
Read more

Blog 5: Boeing 737 Case Study

In this blog post, I will discuss background information related to the context I have selected for my final project. I will be exploring the Boeing 737 Max crashes and subsequent groundings which occurred between 2018 and 2020. This case is a current, real-world controversy that involves engineering, public policy, the environment, and members of the public.  In 2018 and 2019 the Boeing 737 Max passenger aircraft was involved in two major plane crashes which resulted in the death of 346 people. Following these crashes the aircraft was grounded from all travel across the world from March 2019 and December 2020. This 20-month grounding by the Federal Aviation Association (FAA) was the longest recorded for a U.S. airliner and cost Boeing $20 billion in direct costs and an estimated $60 in indirect losses (Isidore, 2020). While the plane was grounded, a series of investigations were conducted by the FAA, Congress, and multiple other government agencies. Reviews by engineering panels ...
Read more

Blog 6: The Young Professional's Survival Guide & Why Things Go Wrong

One of the chapter's that we read this week from the Young Professional's Survival Guide focused on the topic of "Why Things Go Wrong". Related to ethics in the workplace, there are common pitfalls one can avoid in order to try to keep things from going wrong. Oftentimes ethics can be a slippery slope and avoiding these pitfalls can help keep a professional on the "right" track. In the chapter, the authors introduced several dangers that lead professionals to cross the boundary into unethical actions. Some of these dangers included incrementalism, rationalization, and pressure from outside sources. I found several of the psychological experiments used as examples of dangers to be quite interesting and it lead me to consider the overlap of ethics in academic science and the workplace. The two experiments that were used as examples and that stood out to me in this study were Zimbardo's Stanford Prison experiment and Milligram's electric shock study. Th...
Read more